The climax of contingency in relation to the Mediatorial Kingdom
With the end
of the Mediatorial Kingdom in history, there was a transfer of political
supremacy to Gentile power. The children of Israel shall abide many days
without a king (Hos. 3:4). But even with this tragic end to the theocracy, this
does not mean that God had reversed His plans in relation to the nation of
Israel. To this scattered people God will be "a little sanctuary" among the nations (Ezek. 11:16).
Their bondage in Babylon and Persia will last for only seventy years (Jer.
25:11; Dan. 9:2). They will return and rebuild the temple (Hag. 2:5) with a
prospect at some time in the future of even a more glorious temple (Hab. 2:6-9).
And the Shekinah glory which Ezekiel had seen departs by way of the east gate
will return by the same route (Ezek. 43:1-4).
God
appointed Ezekiel a prophet to the exiles in Babylon. But he was to learn that
the Babylonian captivity had not softened their hearts. God warned Ezekiel
that: "The house of Israel will not
hearken unto thee; for they will not hearken unto me: for all the house of
Israel are impudent and hardhearted . . . these men have set up their idols in
their heart, and put the stumbling block of their iniquity before their
face" (Ezek. 3:7; 14:3). There were a few among the exiles like
Ezekiel and Daniel, but they were the very few. The rank and file from the
leadership to the laity were unrepentant. That explains the wide range of
Daniel's confession: "O Lord, to us
belongeth confusion of face, to our kings, to our princes, and to our fathers,
because we have sinned against thee. . . .Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy
law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice" (Dan. 5:8,
11).
But there
was a remnant who responded to this chastisement of the Lord, and they were the
ones who would return after the exile (Ezek. 6:8-10; 14:22-23).
The
Babylonian captivity did not bring the Jews to national repentance, nor was the
return to the land in any sense a national restoration. Except for a brief
period under the Hasmonean dynasty, the Jews never again regained their
political independence. There was no reestablishment of the theocratic
relation, and Jehovah was no longer their king. The interest in Judaism lapsed
into a mere empty formalism. It took the powerful ministry of the prophets
Haggai and Zechariah to arouse the people for the rebuilding of the temple. The
lack of concern for the law of God and its performance brought the final
prophet, Malachi, on the scene. Through intermarriage with foreigners the
people were in danger of being paganized. So he denounced the practice. He
warned them of bringing sick and diseased animals for sacrifice. They were
robbing God of His tithes. They departed so far from the law of God that they
were confusing good and evil. In a final word of warning to the wicked and hope
for the righteous, the voice of Malachi is stilled, and for more than four
hundred years there was a famine of the hearing of the words of the Lord.
Then one
day there came a voice of one crying in the wilderness, "Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight . . .
Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" (Matt. 3:3, 2). The
mightiest prophet of the Old Testament economy has appeared on the scene (Luke
7:28). Malachi foretold the coming of John the Baptist (Mal. 3:1), and the Lord
Jesus confirmed his prophecy (Matt. 11:10; Luke 7:27). The silence of heaven
has been broken, and with "the
spirit and power of Elijah" of old, this prophet aroused the people
and the leadership in Israel by the authority with which he spoke (Luke 1:17;
John 1:19; Luke 3:10, 12, 14). He went before the Lord as His herald to
introduce Him to Israel (John 1:29-34) and to make ready a people prepared for
the Lord (Luke 1:17). Once this ministry was completed then John gradually
withdrew from public attention (John 3:28-30).
It is the
Lord Jesus Christ, the longed for and promised Messiah, who now moves into the
forefront of the attention of the people. His message was like that of John the
Baptist: "Repent: for the kingdom of
heaven is at hand" (Matt. 4:17), or expressed by Mark, "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom
of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel" (Mark 1:15). The
expression "at hand" quite
literally means "has drawn
near." In a sense far above that of the theocratic kingdom in history,
the kingdom has drawn near in the person of the King Himself. This called for a
response on the part of Israel. They must change their minds, and they must be
persuaded of will that this is the One who should come. This meant that they
must ultimately bow the knee to the King.
But the
response did not follow this pattern. There were a few, a faithful remnant in
Israel, who committed themselves to Him. Among these were the apostles (John
6:67-69), but the vast number of His disciples departed (John 6:66). Very few
among the leadership in Israel joined themselves to Him (John 12:42-43), unless
it would be Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea (John 19:38-39), and perhaps the
rich young ruler (Mark 10:21). It was a very small group who remained loyal to
Him, and who provided the nucleus for the formation of the Church on the day of
Pentecost (Acts 1:15; 1 Cor. 15:6).
Two things
stand out clearly by which the rejection of Christ on the part of the nation is
to be explained. Their ignorance of the prophetic Scriptures, and their
unwillingness to submit to the King. In those final hours leading up to the
crisis, Christ made reference to both. As He reached the brow of the hill that
overlooks the city on the day of His triumphal entry, from a breast heaving
with sobs, He said: “If thou hadst known,
even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! But
now they are hid from thine eyes. For the days shall come upon thee, that thine
enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee
in on every side, and shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children
within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because
thou knewest not the time of thy visitation” (Luke 19:41-44). Why did they
not know; were not the prophecies of the Old Testament perfectly clear? While
the answer to this question is perfectly clear to us as we view the situation
after the passing of the centuries, was it possible that it was not nearly so
clear to people of that day. In spite of explanations that are clear to us,
there were some, on the day before his triumphal entry, who thought that
proximity to Jerusalem and the significance of His words meant that He was
going to establish the kingdom right on the spot (Luke 19:11). Even after death
and resurrection there were many disciples who "trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed
Israel" (Luke 24:21). It was the reality of the resurrection that made
them realize they had not believed
all that the prophets had spoken (Luke 24:25).
They did
not understand that Christ must indeed suffer these things and then enter into
His glory (Luke 24:26). This is not surprising for even the prophets who wrote
of the suffering and glory were unable to understand the time element of these
two things (1 Pet. 1:10). Eight times as much space is given to the coming of
Messiah in regal splendor to sit upon a throne of glory as to a Messiah who
would be rejected by His people and subjected by His people and subjected to
the indignity of death like a criminal. Someday when He comes in His glory, the
nation of Israel will confess this tragic oversight. "For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root
out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him,
there is no beauty that we should desire him" (Isa. 53:2).
But there
is a second reason for this response, and this one underlies the first. It is
the moral indisposition of this people to bow the knee to the King. They could
not understand the meaning of the Scriptures because they did not want to see
the truth.
“O Jerusalem,
Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto
thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen
gathereth her thickens under her wings, and ye would not” (Matt. 23:37). I
would, but ye would not. These words were spoken to the spiritual leadership in
Israel a few days later. They were responsible for molding the thinking of the
people. That same desperate disposition and set of the will that developed in
Adam, and has prevailed through the centuries, was now manifested in this final
hour. The events of the next several days will culminate in the greatest
tragedy of history, the rejection and crucifixion of the King of Israel, the
Son of God, the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords.
It is this
contingent response on the part of the nation of Israel that led Christ to
declare, "Therefore I say unto you,
the Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing
forth the fruits thereof” (Matt. 21:43). Since the citizens hated Him and
said, "We will not have this man to
reign over us" (Luke 19:14), then the King took His journey into a far
country and the establishment of the kingdom was delayed. And, in addition, the
house of Israel was left desolate. For as long as this obdurate, stubborn,
intransigent disposition continued, they would not see Him. This has now
lengthened out into two millenniums of time. But there is hope. Someday soon,
the skies will break forth into blinding light, and the King will return, and
they (Israel) shall say, "Blessed is
he that cometh in the name of the Lord" (Matt. 23:39). Then that
Kingdom in the eternal counsels of God will be established in the earth, and
the King shall sit upon the throne of His glory (Matt. 25:31).
No comments:
Post a Comment