THE PRESENTATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF NON-RESISTANCE
It is unfortunate that the title
"non-resistance" has been given to this doctrine. This caption gives
the impression that this pattern of response is something altogether negative
and passive. The name comes from the words of Matt. 5:39, "That ye resist
not evil" [Italics mine], and has become fixed. It now remains for those
who hold this truth to explain what it means. But many who get no further than
the name draw false opinions. Quite to the contrary from what the name suggests, the practice is very positive
and active. Seven elements may help to make clear precisely what is involved.
1. Non-resistance is one aspect of
the Biblical teaching on separation from
the world. One of the first things a saved person is commanded to do is to
separate himself from the practices of this world. Paul admonishes him to be
"not conformed to this world" (Rom. 12:2). This covers all practices
of life that make up the pattern of this present evil age, which practices
conceal the new nature within. Inasmuch as true Christians are "not of
this world" (John 17:16), but have been chosen by Christ out of this world
(John 15:19), it is the divine purpose to keep them from the evil in this world
(John 17:15). One of those evils is the exercise of physical force to accomplish
the purposes of life. This includes the use of physical force in times of peace
and also in times of war.
2. It becomes clear from the basic
injunction on separation that there is a definite separation of church and
state according to the divine Word. Christ declared to Pilate, "My kingdom
is not of this world" (John 18:36). Paul explained that all those who name
the name of Christ and experience the miracle of regeneration have been
translated into the kingdom of Jesus Christ (John 3:3,5; Col. 1:13). They are
no longer of this world even as Christ is not of this world (John 17:16). They
now have citizenship in heaven (Phil. 3:20 ASV), and it is their responsibility
to live like pilgrims and strangers in this world (Heb. 11:8-16). Their conduct
should be conditioned over the pattern of those who belong to another kingdom,
the kingdom of the heavens.
3. Since the church and state
belong to kingdoms or spheres of operation, the methods for defense and offense
should also be different. Christ was so patently clear in addressing Pilate.
"If my kingdom were of this world; then would my servants fight, that I
should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence" (John 18:36). This means
that the believer is not free to employ physical force as a method of warfare.
He cannot "war after the flesh: for the weapons of our warfare are not
carnal" (2 Cor. 10:3-4). But this is not to depreciate the weapons
available to the Christian, for they are "mighty through God to the
pulling down of strongholds" (2 Cor. 10:4).
4. On the basis of the foregoing
points, it follows that physical violence
is forbidden to believers as a method of accomplishing a purpose. A
careful examination of Matt. 5:38-48 leads to the conclusion that physical
violence is not Christian. In the light of the fact that the believer is urged
to follow the example of Christ this conclusion is made even more emphatic (1
John 2:6). For we are exhorted "to walk even as he walked," and to
"follow His steps: who did no sin, neither was guile found in His mouth:
who, when He was reviled, reviled not again; when He suffered, He threatened
not; but committed Himself to Him that judgeth righteously: who His own self
bare our sins in His own body on the tree" (1 Pet. 2:21-24).
5. Where physical violence is
forbidden for any purpose, it is made only too clear that believers have no
right to use physical violence in the propagation of the-Christian faith. This
does not mean that believers are without power for accomplishing the task that
has been committed to them. For the gospel itself is the power of God unto
salvation (Rom. 1:16). As an added encouragement believers are instructed that
"Ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you"
(Acts 1:8). And this power provides the weapons of our warfare that are
"mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds" (2 Cor.
10:4). Whenever the church has turned aside from this equipment to the use of
physical force to enlarge the borders of the church nothing but reproach and
ruin followed in its wake.
6. What has been true in using
physical force to extend the church, has also been true when the church joined the nations of the
world in the exercise of force. This
situation has produced an incongruity that aroused defamation from even men of
the world. If believers belong to the kingdom of Christ, then they do not
belong to the kingdom of the world. And if it is wrong for believers to employ
physical force to advance spiritual interests, then it is also wrong for
believers to join the world in the use of physical force to achieve temporal
interests. The words of Christ come with tremendous power at this point.
"If my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight . . but
now is my kingdom not from hence" (John 18:36).
7. Lest the reader draw an
incorrect conclusion, let it be said here that even though the believer is
forbidden the use of physical force to accomplish a temporal end, he is still
obligated to exercise spiritual means to do
good and to bring blessing to others. Jesus left no doubt in the minds
of His disciples both by example (1 Pet. 2:21-24), and exhortation (Matt.
5:38-48), and apostolic instruction, that believers are responsible to display
good and stand against evil by spiritual means (Rom. 12:17-21; 13:8). While it
is not easy to resist spiritual evil by spiritual means, Christians are left
with no other alternative (James 4:7; 1 Pet. 5:9; Eph. 6:10-13).
No comments:
Post a Comment