THE
EXPLANATION OF THE NEW BIRTH
"Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is
old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born? Jesus
answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of
the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God" (John 3:4-5).
First impressions are often lasting
impressions, and that was true in this case. Frequently the very force of those
impressions carry the movement of thought on to the issue. At least, that was
true in the case of Nicodemus. The very force of this amazing declaration swept
from the mind of Nicodemus his original purpose and plunged him into the very
depths of the mystery associated with the new birth. This brought Nicodemus and
Christ a step closer together. Now they may be seen mind to mind, two great
minds, one finite mind trained in the wisdom of his profession and the other
infinite in whom is hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge, turning
over the issue of life.
Without a doubt Nicodemus had been
grappling with problems gathering about this point throughout the long period
of his ministry. Confronted time and again with problems in his own society, he
had done additional research, and then reviewed again the whole field of the
professional opinion on these points. Undoubtedly, after years of prolonged
study and the weighing of opposing and varying theories, he had finally reached
a conclusion. Perhaps he was not satisfied with his conclusion, but it was the
best that he knew in the light of information that was available. No doubt the
position he held, when examined under the searchlight of reality, had much to
condemn it. But still, it was the best that he knew. Even when he came to the
Old Testament, he was unable to recognize the truth because he was looking
through the lenses of a false system of theology and that is going on today
within the church (not necessarily Bible believing).
But now, from the lips of this Galilean
peasant with the breath of heaven upon Him, there fell upon his ears a clear,
concise statement of new birth that ran counter to anything he had ever heard.
In this statement there was the dogmatic note, no speculation and no proofs
offered. The trained mind of Nicodemus recognized in this pronouncement the
element of authoritativeness. Christ had prefaced His statement with words
indicating absolute finality. Like blinding lightning his consciousness was
electrified and his mind illuminated. All of the problems of sin and salvation,
of promise and prophecy, of the Messiah and His kingdom seemed to converge on
this point of personality.
The movement of thought in verses four and five
depict these two great minds joined almost as one and plunged in the depths of
thought. They are weighing the most mysterious, the most momentous, the most
miraculous, and the most marvelous thing in God's plan for men. Nicodemus is
confronted with a problem which he sets forth in two questions. Jesus responds
with the solution consisting of a series of five principles.
THE PROBLEM OF NICODEMUS IS STATED IN TWO QUESTIONS
"Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is
old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb and be born?" (John 3:4).
The first question contains within it a clear
admission. Before the problem of this man can be viewed in its full
proportions, the admission of wonder must be considered. The question begins
with the word "How?" The
presence of this word does not necessarily deny the fact just affirmed by
Christ, but it does raise the problem of method or procedure. The very weight
of Christ's declaration with its finality has convinced Nicodemus of its truth.
Jesus left no room for argument here. "For
he taught . . . as one having authority, and not as the scribes" (Matt. 7:29). But here was the problem
of procedure. "How can a man be born
when he is old?" Since another birth is the solution, how then can
this be brought about?
Another birth! It is the wonder of this
thought that flashed through the mind of Nicodemus. Would it not be wonderful
to start life all over again? If one could only move the clock of time
backwards and begin life all over again. Or if one could only start where he is
today and live his life all over again. Life is so brief. There is so much to
do. There is so little time to change.
Nicodemus is now old. With advancing age he had
acquired the perspective of age. Like all, as he grew older, he was given to
retrospect. No doubt in those closing years of life, he had many times reviewed
his past life, and with few exceptions found reasons for regret. If only the
past could be blotted out, or he could begin life all over again. And now, like
a breath from heaven, this teacher from God makes authoritative announcement of
another birth. Another birth for those who have already been born! Another
birth for men who lived their lives and have grown old! The very wonder of the
thought captures this sincere and thoughtful man.
The psychology of Nicodemus was doubtless as
up-to-date as ours. He knew the facts of personality. He knew that what he was
that day was the result of all his yesterdays. All those experiences of
infancy, of childhood, of adolescence, of youth, and of manhood added up to
make him what he was now in old age. He knew that the evil and unfortunate
experiences also have their issue in later life. He knew that the good and
blessed experiences also have their issue in later life. No thinking man could
shut his eyes to these realities, some of them almost brutal realities. But if
there were only some way to prevent them before they occur, or once they have
happened to undo them. But alas, these are impossibilities. But this amazing
teacher from God, in un-equivocating language, has just announced another
birth. Could this be the answer to the longing in his heart?
What parent has not thought of this
problem of personality in relation to his own children? If those children could
only start life where the parent leaves off and profit from what good or ill
has been in his experience. But they cannot. The entire realm of human
experience argues that this is impossible. So every child starts where his
parents began. They pass through the same experiences, learning very little
from the counsel of the parents. And when they reach old age, they cherish the
same hope expressed by their parents as they look back over the brief span of
years allotted to them. But is it possible that there is another birth that
will in some way cancel out the lost years and give something above and beyond
anything they have ever known? This teacher from God declared that there is.
But Nicodemus must face the problem. It
cannot be denied to Nicodemus the wonder of the thought that has so lately
flashed through his consciousness. It is wonderful. The very wonder of it warms
the hearts and minds of those to whom it comes. But Nicodemus cannot stop
there. He must raise the problem, "How
can a man be born when he is old?" Procedure posed a problem to him.
It seemed infinitely so to Nicodemus. But it was quite evidently the wonder of
this thought that led him to appeal for an answer concerning method or
procedure. One cannot day dream forever. He must finally come to grips with
reality. And reality dictates that Nicodemus ask the question, "How?"
How is it
possible for a man to be born when he is old? This makes a very literal
translation of the question from the original Greek. This is laying emphasis
upon the process, procedure, method, or manner. Is it possible to turn the
wheel of nature back to the beginning and start life all over again? Is it
possible to start life anew at the time of old age and build on what has
already been accomplished? Others have no doubt thought of these things before
Nicodemus. The doctrine of reincarnation among Hindus is no doubt an attempt.
It remained for Nicodemus to think the thought and receive the clear answer.
But this man's thought processes are far from clear, and it remains for him to
express his confusion in another question.
The second
question is an attempt to answer the first on the human and physical level. "Can he enter a second time into his
mother's womb and be born?" He seeks the maternal and physical help he
had the first time.
Surely
this teacher in Israel, intellectually gifted, professionally trained, widely
read in the Scriptures, and spiritually sensitized, recognized something more
in the words of Jesus than merely another physical birth. The words "see the kingdom of God" must
have quickened his thinking at this point. He must have sensed that Jesus was
reaching below the level of the mere physical to the spiritual and
psychological substance of life. But he also knew that the spiritual and
psychological elements of life run concurrently with the physical and are
inextricably bound up with it.
Within this frame of reference
Nicodemus phrases his next question. "Is
it possible for one to enter the second time into his mother's womb and be
born?" The obvious answer he was expecting was "No." The very construction of this sentence in the
original Greek indicates that he expected the answer "No." Nicodemus knew that he was the result of processes.
He knew that at the moment he voiced the question, he was the result of what he
was an hour ago, a day, a week, a month, a year, as a matter of fact all the
years of his life. Could he now be turned back into embryonic form in his
mother's womb and be born again? This he knew was impossible on the physical
level. The inseparable association of the spiritual and the psychological with
the physical made it equally impossible on the higher level. In fact, the very
nature of the spiritual and psychological elements of personality made it even
more impossible for such a thing to happen.
The second
question, therefore, was designed to answer the first question, but to do so by
drawing proof from impossibility on the physical level. In this response
Nicodemus was frankly facing the problem of procedure with the best knowledge
available. Nicodemus may be censured for this, but Jesus did not do so at this
moment. He apparently recognized the sincerity of this man, and the wonder that
had been awakened in him, and He went on to satisfy that wonder. The wonder of
the thought lingers with Nicodemus. It is only the process that throws a shadow
across his path. "How?"
"How is it possible?" That is what he wants to know. And Jesus
goes on to answer this problem in his mind.
"Jesus answered, Verily,
verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he
cannot enter into the kingdom of God" (John 3:5).
Verses five
through eight comprise the full answer made by Christ to the two-fold question
of Nicodemus. In this answer Christ enunciates a series of five principles.
Wisdom dictates that this meditation be limited to a discussion of the first
principle as set forth in verse five, and that the remaining four principles
become the subject for the next study.
At this
point, for the purpose of properly introducing Christ's answer in verse five, a
series of observations should be made to keep thinking clear. First, verse 5
does not introduce a new subject. Jesus is still dealing with the subject of
new birth. Second, this is a restatement of the declaration made in verse
three, though in slightly different words. Third, this statement is the answer
to the appeal of Nicodemus as expressed in the word "how." Fourth, the words "born of water and of the Spirit" are intended to explain
the word "again" (from
above) in verse 3. Fifth, this verse is intended to correct the false
impression of Nicodemus that this birth is in any way to be interpreted as on
the human level. That is the reason for the words, "of the Spirit." Sixth, but it is also intended to
explain the means by which this becomes effective in men. This explanation is
to be found in the words "of
water." Seventh, verses 6-8, while a part of the answer, do not supply
any added information. They are intended as notes to guard Nicodemus from
arriving at any false notions about what He has said. They constitute
safeguards so he will not slip off the narrow path of truth stated in verses 3
and 5.
Much of
the statement appearing in verse five appears almost word for word in verse
three. Since we have already considered much of this when studying verse three,
it will not be; necessary to repeat it in this meditation. But there is a
phrase which is new, that portion of the verse which reads, "Of water and of the Spirit."
It is the purpose of this discourse, therefore, to examine these words
carefully, because they no doubt were intended by Christ to explain the word "again" (from above) in verse
three. It was the failure of Nicodemus to catch the full significance of this
word that impelled him to ask "How?"
Now Christ must direct His answer to that particular point.
These words, "of water and of the Spirit," describe and enumerate the
means or the elements which combine to bring about the event of new birth. It
is essential to note five different things about these words to determine
precisely what they mean. These may sound a bit technical, and they are. But
they are essential to the understanding of this statement on Christ. If the
Greek language were the native tongue of those who read this account, there
would hardly be any need for this explanation. It still remains, though, that
once the original language is accurately rendered into English, the ideas must
be carefully examined for the sake of knowing what great truth Christ was
conveying to this great teacher in Israel. In logical order these five
fundamental facts will now be examined.
There is just one thing under consideration in these words, "of water and of the Spirit."
The phrase "of water and of the Spirit" is the rendering given in
the King James Version of the Scriptures. The American Standard Version and the
Revised Standard Version translate, "Of
water and the Spirit." It will be noticed that the second preposition "of” in the KJV is in; italics,
indicating that it does not appear in the original Greek. Both the ASV and RSV
properly omit it in their translations. This means that there is just one
preposition "of” used with "water and Spirit." The
conclusion is a most important one. Since there is just one preposition
governing the entire phrase, this points to the fact that the words "water and Spirit" are to be
regarded as one thing, and not as two separate things. Both of these things
joined together as one are absolutely essential to bring about the new birth.
While the easiest reading of this text would lead the average person to this
conclusion, the grammatical usage of the one preposition followed by two words
joined by "and" makes this
conclusion absolutely and technically valid. This one thing under consideration
as set forth in the phrase, "Of
water and of the Spirit," has two sides to it.
It is only fair now to point out that
while there is just one thing under consideration, this one thing has two sides
to it. As you look at one side you see water, and as you look at the other side
you see Spirit. In other words, these two aspects work together. They do not
work separately in relation to the new birth. The aspect of water not only
stands first in the phrase, but it also works first in order, and also in the
nature of the case. Spirit not only stands second in the phrase, but it also
works second in order and in the nature of the case. Nor is the above
explanation to lead the reader to conclude that these two things work separately
from one another. In fact, they are so vitally bound together into one thing,
that the order sometimes is only logical, not necessarily chronological; that
is, the two work at exactly the same time. The working of water is primary and
fundamental. The working of Spirit is pursuant and completing. The water
prepares the way for the Spirit to operate, and thus they join to bring about
and complete the event of new birth.
These two sides, as expressed in the
phrase "of water and of the
Spirit," are either on the same level or in the same sphere.
In this phrase, water and spirit are
joined by what is called the coordinate conjunction "and." This conjunction is used to join things that are
on the same level or in the same sphere. By this we mean that these two things
must be either material on the one hand, or they must be spiritual on the other
hand. One cannot be material while the other is spiritual.
The most common interpretation is that water
refers to the material side of the new birth and the spirit refers to the
spiritual side of the new birth; that is, water points to the ordinance of
water baptism and spirit points to the experience of regeneration. But this
cannot be the case, if one is to observe the clear grammatical structure of the
phrase.
In spite of the pressure of numbers, to
conclude that this must be the meaning of this phrase, several features
involving pure logic forbid it. First, even though the word water appears in
the text, the word baptism does not appear. To assume that the word water
refers to baptism is thus wholly gratuitous. Second, if this is water baptism
that is meant, to what water baptism does it refer? Jewish baptism? John's
baptism? The one Jesus authorized? Or Christian baptism which was yet three
years away? Third, if it is to be argued that this is Christian baptism,
surely, it must be the right kind of Christian baptism. What mode is to be
insisted upon: trine immersion, effusion, or sprinkling?
If one still insists that water refers to
the material element of baptism, then the word spirit should also be
interpreted as referring to some material element in order to comply with the
grammatical construction. In the material sense it must then refer to wind; for
the same word is translated "wind" in verse 8. Is it reasonable to
conclude that Jesus has declared that the new birth is something that is
accomplished by means of water and wind? It is the opinion of the writer that
most Christians would recoil from such a suggestion.
This means that there is just one other
alternative left. It would therefore seem far better, since both of these
things must be in the same realm or on the same level, to understand that these
two things, water and wind, are symbols of immaterial or spiritual things. The
water symbolizes something that cleanses, and the wind symbolizes something
that quickens. To this point the Scriptures are very clear, and they provide
abundant evidence for this fact. Here are two things that combine in the
spiritual realm to bring about the miracle of new birth.
These two sides, represented by water and spirit, are definitely qualitative
in nature.
At this point it is necessary to point to
another item of the Greek language, though technical in nature that is yet
definitely helpful in determining the meaning of this statement. The definite
article "the" does not
appear at all in the original Greek of the phrase. In the KJV the article "the" does not appear with the
word water, but it is used with the word Spirit. But in the original Greek it
does not appear with either word. The absence of the article means that these
two words are to be considered from the standpoint of their nature and
function.
The nature and function of water is to cleanse.
As such it serves as a remarkable symbol for the instrument which prepares the
way for the new birth. In this same Gospel, Jesus declared that it is the Word
of God which cleanses. "Now ye are
clean through the word which I have spoken unto you" (John 15:3). Paul attached the same function
to the word, "That he might sanctify
and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word" (Eph. 5:26). This particular cleansing
of the word of God is judicial in character. It leads one to the realization
that he is a sinner under the sentence of divine judgment. This word also
informs him that it was the blood of Christ that paid the penalty and fully
satisfied a holy God. It encourages such a sinner to accept
remission of penalty by faith in Christ, and thus to experience judicial
cleansing from sin. There is a personal, experiential cleansing of the Word of
God that operates in the believer after regeneration, but that aspect of the
Word of God is not under consideration in this passage. But once the judicial
cleansing from sin is a settled fact, the new birth takes place. That is why
James declared that the Word of God is the instrument in bringing about the new
birth. "Of his own will begat he us
by the word of truth" (James
1:18).
The, nature
and function of wind is to give breath. As such it serves as a remarkable
symbol for the personal agent in bringing about the new birth. The personal
agent in the new birth is the Holy Spirit of God. His particular nature and
function is to quicken, make alive, and impart life. Later in conversation with
the Jews, Jesus declared this. "It
is the Spirit that quickens" (John
6:63). From Genesis to Revelation, when the immediate source of life is
denoted, it is always the Spirit of God to whom this function is attributed. It
is therefore altogether logical that the Word of God and the Spirit of God
should be joined together in the event of new birth.
It is therefore in
order to affirm at this point that there is an affinity between the Word of God
and the Spirit of God. Both are said to be living. And since they are, it is
not surprising that they both function in the miracle of regeneration. In
almost the same breath when stating the fact that the Spirit makes alive, Jesus
went onto say, "The flesh profits
nothing; the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are
life" (John 6:63).
To clinch this fact
in relation to the new birth, the reader should have his attention called to
one passage where the Word of God and the Spirit of God are both declared to be
operative in the new birth. "Being
born again, not of corruptible seed, but incorruptible, by the word of God,
which lives and abides forever" (1
Pet. 1:23). The incorruptible seed is the Spirit of God who imparts life.
The Word of God is the instrument by means of which this new birth is affected.
These things
so clearly stated in the phrase "of
water and of the Spirit" were revealed long ago in the Old Testament.
This means that
Nicodemus should have known them. And Jesus told him so. "Art thou the teacher of Israel, and understand not these things?"
(John 3:10 ASV). The popularity and
prominence of this man in Israel as an able and accurate interpreter of the Old
Testament should have qualified him at this point. But it did not. He
undoubtedly knew the words to which Christ made reference, but due to systems
of theology which twisted them out of their most natural meaning, the truth was
hidden from his eyes. This was indeed a tragedy. This man whose wide learning
and sincere motive could have made him a power among his people for good was
ignorant of one of the primary and fundamental doctrines of the Scriptures in
its relation to the kingdom.
Six centuries before,
when the fortunes of Israel were at their lowest ebb because of the sin and
wickedness of the people, God promised new birth as the method of preparing men
for His kingdom. "Then will I
sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness,
and from all your idols, will I cleanse you. A new heart also will I give you,
and a new spirit will I put within you; and I will take away the stony heart
out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause
you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them"
(Ezek. 36:25-27).
In this prophecy of long ago, the words
water and spirit appear. It is clear that the water is for cleansing, and the
spirit is for quickening. The cleansing will proceed from the statutes and
judgments they will obey, and the new heart will be experienced from the
presence of the Spirit of God within. For people who experience this
transformation, the prophecy goes on to say, "And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and
ye shall be my people, and I will be your God. . . . And they shall say, this
land that was desolate is become like the garden of Eden" (Ezek. 36:28, 35). Could ever language
more clearly set forth the preparation of people for the kingdom?
No comments:
Post a Comment