Political Disaster Had Been Predicted by Samuel
Ye shall cry out in that day because of your king. —1 Sam. 8:18
It is easy to forget that "we the people" in the long
run must always pay for whatever the government does for us. Only fools suppose
that by committing a matter to the government, they can get it done for
nothing. Still worse, human government not only makes the people pay for
everything done for them, but it always makes them pay more than it should
cost. For only a part of the wealth taken by the government ever comes back to
the people in services. No lesson in human history is taught more clearly than
this, yet the lesson apparently is never learned. When, in the days of Samuel,
the Jewish people became dissatisfied with the simple and direct rule of
Jehovah and demanded a king "like
all the nations," they had been plainly warned of the high cost they
would pay for being thus governed (1 Sam. 8:7-20). The passage reads as
follows:
7.
And the Lord said unto Samuel . .
.
9. Now therefore hearken unto
their voice: howbeit yet protest solemnly unto them, and shew them the manner
of the king that shall reign over them.
10. And Samuel told all the words
of the LORD unto the people that asked of him a king.
11. And he said this will be the
manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take your sons, and
appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some
shall run before his chariots.
12. And he will appoint him
captains over thousands, and captains over fifties; and will set them to ear
his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of war, and
instruments of his chariots.
13. And he will take your
daughters to be confectionaries, and to be cooks, and to be bakers.
14. And he will take your fields
and your vineyards, and your olive-yards, even the best of them, and give them
to his servants.
15. And he will take the tenth of
your seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his
servants.
16. And he will take your
menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your
asses, and put them to his work.
17. He will take the tenth of your
sheep: and ye shall be his servants.
18. And ye shall cry out in that
day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not
hear you in that day.
19. Nevertheless the people
refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a
king over us;
20. That we also may be like all
the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight
our battles.
This remarkable passage deserves
to be studied, not only by theologians and preachers, but also by political
scientists and economists. It shows that the needs and problems of human
government do not change much from generation to generation. The reader will
find here, not only an accurate prediction of the trends of government in the
historical kingdom of Israel, but also many items which are currently trying
the souls of thoughtful men in the field of government in Nations world-wide. Actually there is not
much difference between the various types of political government, as regards
their avowed purposes and general tendencies. For all alike start out with the
best of professed intentions to give the governed something better than they
have had.
In the days of Samuel, Israel had
wanted a king to "judge"
them and to lead them in their "battles"
(1 Sam. 8:20). We have here a recognition of the two problems of order and power; the one internal, and the other external. These two have been
called "the original and fundamental
values of government." It is an axiom of history that no government
has ever succeeded, even temporarily, without offering to the people these two
values. No dictator or tyrant ever ruled who did not, to some extent, provide
for (1) order within the state and
(2) protection against external enemies. This, then, is the fundamental
good supplied by all government in some measure regardless of its character or
motives.
The real difference between the
various kinds of government is found in the
price people have had to pay for these benefits of internal order and external
safety. And the stability of
government will vary according to the cost of being governed. This is
why a dictatorship in the long run is the most unstable of all government
because it greatly overestimates the price men will be willing to pay for its
benefits.
We may say, therefore, that Israel
was right in her desire for the benefits of order and power. Her mistake is
found in the kind of government she asked for. Not that there is anything
fundamentally wrong with the monarchical form; for the final and perfect
government on earth will be centralized in a "King." But Israel asked for a king like all the nations (1
Sam. 8:19-20). And that kind of a government would cost the people dearly in
the long run, as Samuel warned the nation. For, no matter how low the cost at
the beginning, the inevitable trend is upward;
and the rise is often swift.
Compare, for example, the simple requirements of the government under Saul with
the gigantic and costly machine under Solomon — all within the brief span of
one generation.
Let us now, in the prophecy of 1
Samuel 8:7-20, observe the tendencies which would arise to plague Israel, and
which are inherent in all government under sinful men, i.e., government "like all the nations."
a. Government service. Under the contemplated king the government
will bring the people into its service: first, into military service for "chariots" and "horsemen" (1 Sam. 8:11); and
second, into civil service of various kinds — agricultural, manufacturing, and
food processing (1 Sam. 8:12-13). (America is now in the school system and finally into healthcare). Here we have a beginning of governmental
bureaucracy, the growth of which in all recorded history of the nations has
never been voluntarily halted.
b. Job-making. This will begin in the military department of
government where there will be not only "captains
over thousands" but also "captains
over fifties" (1 Sam. 8:12). Speaking in modern terms, they make the
units smaller so as to create and use more generals! Some men will be employed
to "run before" the king's
chariots (1 Sam. 8:11) — a perfectly useless procedure, except for creating
public attention. Once launched, men have generally found it impossible to
control or dislodge any department of government service. On the contrary, each
one invariably tries to expand in scope and numbers.
c. Labor scarcity. The Word of God through Samuel warns Israel
that the government will take "your
sons" and "daughters,"
"your menservants" and "maidservants"
(1 Sam. 8:11, 13, 16). Thus the unwarranted expansion of the governmental
service will take many people out of normally productive pursuits. Sons and
daughters who ought to be helping in family activities, as well as other
workers needed on farms and in factories, are drawn into the service of the
government. The result is labor shortages and serious economic instability.
d. Government for its own sake. The state now comes first. As
the Bible puts the matter, the ruler sets his employees “to doing "his work" (1 Sam. 8:16), "for himself" (vs. 11), for "his harvest" (1 Sam. 8:12),
and for "his chariots" (1
Sam. 8:11). Thus the energies of the state are now primarily devoted to the
maintenance of the government. For, no matter how idealistically political
officials may talk about serving "the
people," the ugly fact remains that a government is interested first
and last in its own support and perpetuation. Therefore, the average employee
must render his first loyalty to the government, which generally means to the "party" or cabal that controls
it. In this way the labors of men tend to become nonproductive; personal
incentive is diminished; and the vested interests of government operate for their
own sake.
e. Burdensome taxation. To support all its army of employees
and officials takes money. Hence, the state must always be increasing the
taxes to keep up with the growth of the bureaucracy. And so, in the words of
Samuel, the government will take "a
tenth of your seed . . . of your vineyards . . . of your sheep" (1
Sam. 8:15, 17). Gloomy as the picture seems, it should be noted that this
predicted tax would be only one-tenth of one thing, namely, the food production
of the governed. In our more enlightened modern times, the cost of government
actually exceeds the value of all our expenditure for food! Today a mere ten
per cent tax on all production would be hailed as an approach to the
Millennium. The curse of heavy taxation has been thus described by a noted
modern economist: "For every
additional dollar that the government spends, the taxpayers have one dollar
less to spend. The situation is worse than this. Taxation erodes the incentives
to produce and earn. It penalizes success, and the production of marketable
products, often in order to subsidize continued production of unmarketable
products. up an army of tax-gatherers. In the end it meets fewer real than
before. People spend the money they themselves earn on what they themselves
really want. The government spends money, not on what the rest of us want, but
on what the bureaucrats think is good for US." What used to be our money has become "his" money for he spends it for the better.
f. Property confiscation. This is the next logical move of the
state.
Hence, we read in this eighth chapter of First Samuel that the no longer satisfied with a tax on production, begins to take over the basic sources of wealth; i.e., "your fields . . your vineyards . . . your olive yards, even the best of them" (1 Sam. 8:14). Respect for private property diminishes in proportion to the expansion of government and its vast monetary requirements. The devices of confiscation today are various and often disguised by high-sounding terms — controlled currency, social legislation, income taxation, the public good — but underneath them all, the relentless search goes on to find more sources of income for the state. And once started on this road, there is humanly speaking no point of return.
Hence, we read in this eighth chapter of First Samuel that the no longer satisfied with a tax on production, begins to take over the basic sources of wealth; i.e., "your fields . . your vineyards . . . your olive yards, even the best of them" (1 Sam. 8:14). Respect for private property diminishes in proportion to the expansion of government and its vast monetary requirements. The devices of confiscation today are various and often disguised by high-sounding terms — controlled currency, social legislation, income taxation, the public good — but underneath them all, the relentless search goes on to find more sources of income for the state. And once started on this road, there is humanly speaking no point of return.
g. Political corruption. The ancient prophecy of Samuel warns
further that the government will take the wealth, acquired by taxation and
confiscation, and "give to his
officers, and to his servants" (1 Sam. 8:15). It is an unpleasant fact
that a large share of government income always finds its way into the hands of
the partisans of the ruling party. Of course, politicians will talk grandly
about devoting the "public
wealth" to the "common
good," but this is never wholly the case. Often it is taken away from
those who produced it and given to the undeserving. In fact, some modern
economists and state officials have frankly asserted the desirability of thus
redistributing the wealth of society. But to carry out these "benevolent" purposes, the
rulers must keep themselves in power. And once a government gets enough people
working for it, the problem is solved. The formula is simple — spend, tax,
elect — as one cynical official tersely put the matter.
h. Totalitarian control. The final word of Samuel's prophecy,
concerning the Gargantuan growth of human government when left to itself, is
addressed to the whole nation of Israel, "Ye
shall be his servants" (1 Sam. 8:17). Thus the end of the vicious
circle is reached when all the people exist and work only for the State, which
swallows up the very citizens who created it. It is to the lasting credit of
the founding fathers of our own American system that they regarded all highly
centralized government with a deep and cold suspicion, holding that the less we
had of it, the better off we would be. But strangely enough today, for every
failure of highly centralized government, its supporters have no remedy except
a larger dose of the same thing —"the
hair of the dog that bit them."
i. Intolerable oppression. The overall result of the above tendencies
is deep distress for all the subjects of the State. In the words of Scripture, "Ye shall cry out in that day because
of your king which ye shall have chosen you" (1 Sam. 8:18). And we
must not fail to note that this oppression has been caused not by some foreign
power, but by the very government that the people had chosen. Human government
is necessary, but people who are wise never let it get too big or powerful.
Unless strictly limited, the end is the loss of liberty, economic distress, and
political despair.
America has thrown the God of the Bible out of the picture for the last couple of generations, the ones that are now voting. (Men and their political view determines truth, right and wrong, (Isa. 5:20-21) not the Bible at this point). So this article is a fairy tale to most in this country as well as other countries around this world until the outcome is beyond repair, as is the condition in most countries today until repentance to the God of the Bible is made. But there is a hero yet to show which will unite all these failing political, social, and economic entities with a solution to cure all their woes and the world buys into his solution, but woe to all who do. (2 Thes. 2:3-4) As the Bible plainly reveals America is not there in the end because she was swallowed up by another. Is it a member of the new order of the christ to come?
No comments:
Post a Comment