Two Parabolic Illustrations
Luke 14:25-35
Two parabolic illustrations are
found in this paragraph. It is important again that we briefly review the
circumstances. The 25th verse reads, "There
went with Him great multitudes." Our Lord had left the house of the
Pharisee where strange things had happened, and where He had found no congenial
atmosphere. The hostility of the host was manifested in the presence there of
the man with the dropsy. The behavior of the guests was at fault, and the
principle of the hospitality of the host was wrong, as Jesus had shown. Then in
answer to that exclamation of one of the guests, Jesus had spoken that parable
of the great supper, the intention of which was to show the reluctance of the
human heart, especially in Israel. Admiring the ideal, men were not prepared to
submit to the conditions. That all happened in the house.
Having left the house, our Lord
now used two parabolic illustrations. He had moved away, and started on His journey
towards Jerusalem, the place of His execution. The seventy had finalized their
ministry which obviously had a great impact. Another reason for the presence of
large numbers of people when He entered Jerusalem (Matt. 19:2; Mark 10:1; Luke
11:29; 12:1) was the spectacular miracle of raising Lazarus from the dead. This
immediately became a matter of high public interest. John says, “Much people”
had come “that they might see Lazarus also, whom He had raised from the dead”
(John 12:29). All the public furor greatly disturbed the religious officials in
Israel, for Lazarus alive made it impossible to deny the reality of the
miracle. Therefore, with practical astuteness they laid plans to kill the risen
man and thus put an end to the public excitement and the consequent increase of
the Lord’s following.
So while He had been in that
house, there were multitudes of people outside, who had been waiting for Him.
These were the last months of our Lord's public ministry, and by this time,
wherever He went, the crowds went after Him, following Him from town to town,
and village to village, eager, keen, interested, loving to hear Him, and to
watch Him, and wanting to be near Him. In many cases, perhaps the majority,
they felt they would like to be connected with Him, enrolled as His followers.
They were all waiting for Him, and "there
went with Him great multitudes." The moment He came out of the house
these waiting people outside were alert; and as He moved away, they went after
Him. That is the significance of the next phrase, "And He turned, and said unto them." Upon this occasion
He declared the terms of discipleship. It is almost like a fierce wind that
blew across that crowd, unquestionably winnowing them. Yes, Jesus was winsome,
but there was another aspect to His ministry, as well as winning. He was winnowing,
and while He won those crowds, and they were interested, and were coming after
Him, just as crowds do today, and are still doing, He turned round, and not
this time only, superlatively, but constantly, He said things that blew like a
wind of God across that crowd, thinning out those who wanted to be His
followers. He gave them the terms of discipleship.
There is a phrase here from the
lips of Jesus thrice repeated in this paragraph. "Cannot be My disciple" (verse 26). "Cannot be My disciple" (verse 27). "Cannot be My disciple" (verse 33). He was telling them
that there were people who, however much they were interested in Him, were like
the man left in the house, admiring His ideals, but could not be His disciple.
Who were they? I can never read these words without trembling, and wondering
whether I am a disciple. If any man were coming after Him, he could not do this
unless he put loyalty to Him above the highest and finest and noblest loyalties
of earthly love. It was a tremendous saying. He said unless a man do that, he
could not be His disciple. Then to interpret what He meant by that saying, He
declared, "Yea, and his own life
also." Not only earthly loves, high, affectionate loves, but the love
of self, and the love of life. Then He interpreted that. "Whosoever doth not bear his own cross"—that is failing
to love self,—"and come after Me,
cannot be My disciple." Then finally, to summarize everything, Unless
a man "renounceth not all that he
hath, he cannot be My disciple." All this said as He was approaching
Jerusalem for the last time.
Then something happened. This
passage is only understood as we can see that crowd imaginatively. We need not
travel to Palestine where He was at the time, nor need we go back two thousand
years to see it. Take any massed company of men and women gathered together
today, in an evangelistic service, interested in Jesus, attracted towards Him,
and having a feeling that they would like, in some measure, to be associated
with Him. Then let the preacher, as the mouthpiece of the Master, declare these
terms of discipleship, and then look at that crowd. They will be more attentive
than ever for the moment; but if one is keen enough to discern the fact, there
is a puzzled, almost restless look, and at last a protesting look, as though
they would say, but surely those terms are severe, Cannot it be made easier
than that? Cannot we be His followers, and listen to Him and admire Him, and
rejoice in His power without such drastic measures? Humanity is just the same
today as then. Jesus would say to them today without any reservation, what He
said to them in the olden days. That is the background of these illustrations.
What then is the subject He was
illustrating? Without any question He was showing the reason why His terms
were severe. Men and women were looking into His face and saying, why be so
severe? He used two parabolic illustrations to show them the reason why.
Look again at the illustrations.
He said, "Which of you, desiring to
build a tower, doth not first sit down and count the cost, whether he have
wherewith to complete it? Lest haply, when he hath laid a foundation, and is not
able to finish, all that behold begin to mock him, saying, This man began to
build, and was not able to finish." The second illustration, "Or what king, as he goeth to encounter
another king in war, will not sit down first and take counsel whether he is able
with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? Or
else, while the other is yet a great way off, he sendeth an embassage, and
asketh conditions of peace."
To come now to a technicality. The
next verse in the Authorized Version begins, "So likewise whosoever he be." That is an unfortunate
translation, one that has misled the thinking of men generally as to the
meaning of these two illustrations. The Revised Version has correctly
translated the Greek phrase, which never meant "likewise," but "So
therefore." What is the difference? If we read "So likewise," then Jesus meant that just as the man
going to build a tower, and the king going to war, must both count the cost; so
must we if we are coming after Him. But our Lord said, "So therefore." He never told men to count the cost. They
were to come at all cost, at the cost of earthly love, and the cost of
renouncing everything.
What then did He mean? That He had
to count the cost, and that was why His terms were severe, in the interest of
what He was doing. "So
therefore." Note the difference carefully between "likewise" and "therefore"
in that passage. Notice also the repetition three times over of the phrase, "Cannot be." Behind that "cannot be" were instructions
that proved to men that they were to stop bargaining and counting the cost;
that they were to trample on personal love and ambition and all possessions.
They were to come at all cost. Yet He showed the necessity of His counting the
cost.
Take then, the two figures. First,
building, the figure of construction. Building is the great symbol of
construction. But He used a second figure, war, and battle, and battle is
destructive. Building is constructive work; battle is destructive work. He said,
if a man wants to do constructive work, to build a tower, he sits down first
and counts the cost. If he does not do so, the purpose of his building will be
frustrated, and he will never be able to complete it, and men will laugh at
him. Some buildings have been called some man's folly. Some man started to
build, and he could not finish it, and carry out his purpose. That was the
first figure of speech.
Then a king going to battle, before
he goes, if he is wise—and this is pure political wisdom—he finds out whether
every man in his army is worth two of the enemy. That is a different
mathematical formula of expressing the thought of the text, "whether he is able with ten thousand
to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand." He needs
his every soldier to be equal to two of the enemy. That is our Lord's estimate.
Then that satirical word; if the king do not do that, if his men are not of
that quality, presently there will be an embassage sent to the opposing forces,
asking for conditions of peace—surrender!
Building. If one does not count
the cost, there will be failure and laughter. Battle. If one does not take time
to find out the quality of the soldiers, there will be defeat; and conditions
of peace will have to be asked from the enemy. Those are the two figures of
speech. Our Lord had just uttered the terrifying terms of discipleship, and men
were inclined to protest. He said to them in effect, you wonder at the severity
of My terms. Let Me tell you why they are severe. He used the two figures of
speech, and asked them to think the matter through. What did He mean? That He
was in the world to build. If any man were going to build, would he not count
the cost, whether he could carry out his purpose? That is what He was doing.
That was why His terms were severe. He appealed to their own common-sense, to
their own experience, and to their intelligence. They were no warriors or
kings, but they knew enough of war. What king does not sit down and calculate,
on the basis of the quality of his soldiers?
What were the implications? Here
our Lord was declaring His purpose in the world. He was here for building and
battle. At Caesarea Philippi, in other language, He had used the same terms in
addressing Peter and the rest. "On
this rock I will build My Church,"—building. What next? "And the gates of Hades shall not
prevail against it,"—battle. The ultimate purpose of His presence was
constructive; but on the way to the completion of the work on which His heart
was set, there were battles to be waged and won. He had told His disciples that
He would build. He had told them He would conduct the campaign victoriously,
that the gates of Hades should not prevail against it. Victory was in His mind.
The fulfillment of purpose was there. He would build. Now He used the same
figures in a slightly different application.
Thus He was telling them that the
purpose of, and the reason of the severity was the greatness of His own
emprise; and the fact that in order to complete that building and win that
battle, He must have resources and men upon whom He could absolutely depend. He
was showing them that following Him meant more than personal advantage only.
Personal advantage was secondary, and in the presence of His Cross was smitten
out of sight as almost unimportant. Oh the terror of it that we have so often
made our salvation a kind of fire insurance, a way by which we may escape hell!
Following Jesus meant far more than that, and this was what He was showing His
disciples. To follow Him was to commit oneself to His enterprises, to stand by
Him in the battle, to stand with Him in the battle, until the building is done,
and the battle is won.
I will use an old illustration.
When Charles Haddon Spurgeon was exercising his marvelous ministry, and
building up the Pastors' College, he started a magazine, the title of which was
"The Sword and the Trowel."
Nehemiah when building the wall of Jerusalem commanded the workers to grasp the
sword as well as the trowel, to fight the enemies that would hinder the
building. Spurgeon knew that little incident of ancient Hebrew history was
symbolic of the action of God through the Jews, and of the mission of Jesus
Christ. Jesus came to build; and He came for battle. He had left the house of
the Pharisee and found Himself surrounded by thronging multitudes interested in
Him. As He started to move away, they came with Him. He turned, and halted
them, and said in effect, what are you following Me for? Are you coming after
Me? I am in this world to build. I am in this world to battle. You are no good
to Me unless you are of the right quality, the right caliber. I do not want
followers coming after Me for their own sake. I want those committed to Me and
to My enterprises. That was the meaning of the illustrations. He it was Who
had to count the cost, not they. He knew where He was headed.
Thus by these very illustrations,
by the use of these terms of severity, our Lord emphasized the importance of
quality. Quality is always the thing that counts in the Church of God, and
among the disciples of Jesus, not quantity. We have such an unholy passion for
quantity. We say, Great crowds go to that Church; it is a scene of success. Not
at all. It may be that little chapel down in the valley, or on the hill-side,
away in the Highlands, or in the valleys of the inner city where the two and
the three are gathered is of more use to God than the great congregation simply
attracted by something less than the highest. It is quality that counts, and He
wants quality, men and women on whom He can depend, who are with Him, with
sword in hand, and who lay stone upon stone in the mighty building, men and
women who will stand there against all opposition.
"The Son of God goes forth to war,
A Kingly crown to gain.
His blood-banner streams afar,
Who follows in His train?'"
A Kingly crown to gain.
His blood-banner streams afar,
Who follows in His train?'"
Let us get to our knees and ask if we are such upon whom He
can depend.
After He had uttered these words,
the crowds still listening to Him, He ended with that vibrant challenge,
marking the ultimate importance of what He had been saying, "He that hath ears to hear, let him
hear." Which words lead us to the fifteenth chapter, and to our next article.
No comments:
Post a Comment