Translate

Thursday, December 14, 2017

PRE-FALL BOUNDARIES

PRE-FALL BOUNDARIES


The old word spoken to the father of the race was "have dominion." (Gen. 1:28) In the midst of a wondrous creation God set man. The creation in which man found himself had not yet realized all the possibilities of its own being. It waited the touch of man in cooperation with God for that realiza­tion. God put man into a garden to dress it, and to keep it. The preparation of man's work was of God, the crea­tion of the worker was of God, there was perfect fitness between the work to be done, and the workman prepared, and while man lived in fellowship with God, and co­operated with God, all creation recognized his leadership, yielded to his dominion, and moved along the line of a new progress towards a yet more wondrous beauty and per­fection.
These truths are yet evidenced by the power of man even in a fallen condition. All the cultivation of flowers, all the inventions of science, are in the last analysis, but man's cooperation with God, issuing in new forms of beauty, and fresh forces of utility. A very simple illustra­tion in floral culture is that of the chrysanthemum. But a very few years ago it was looked upon as an old-fashioned garden flower, very sweet, but very simple. Today it is one of the most gorgeous and marvelous of decorative blossoms, so beautiful in the length and delicacy of its petals, so poetic in its restless waviness of beauty, and so splendid in its possibility of color, that it has well been de­scribed as "a rose gone wild with joy." (Dr. Joseph Parker) The possibility of this beauty always lay within the modest garden flower, and the development thereof has been wholly due to man's discovery of certain laws of Nature, which laws are eves the thoughts of God.
So also in the realm of scientific discovery. Let a map of the world be taken, and let the hand be placed upon the centers where such discoveries have been made, and it will invariably be found that the hand is resting on a land where the light of the Christian revelation has most brightly shined. These things but go to prove that it is in coopera­tion with God that man is capable of highest activity, be­cause in cooperation with God he realizes the perfection of character. UNFALLEN MAN, THEN, WAS A BEING LIKE GOD, IN THE ESSENTIALS OF HIS NATURE, IN THAT HE WAS A SPIRIT HAVING INTELLIGENCE, EMOTION, AND WILL. UNFALLEN MAN REALIZED THE HIGHEST POSSIBILITY OF HIS BEING IN A LIFE OF PERSONAL FELLOW­SHIP AND COOPERATIVE ACTIVITY WITH GOD.
There yet remains one other fact to remember, concerning the unfallen condition of man. He was placed in cir­cumstances of probation. That is to say, the stronghold of his nature was his will. It was for him to choose whether he would abide in that relation to God, which would en­sure his fullest realization of possibility, or whether he would by severance from God encompass his own ruin. It was a terrible and awful alternative. Yet unless it were offered to man, the highest fact of his being would be atrophied, for will power, having no choice, ceases to be of value. Thus in the garden of his activity God marked the limit of his possibility by two sacramental symbols. Both were trees. The one was the tree of life, (Gen. 2:9; Prov. 3:18; 11:30; 13:12; 15:4 and Rev. 2:7; 22:2, 14, 19) of which he was commanded to eat. The other was the tree of the knowl­edge of good and evil, (Gen. 2:9) which was forbidden. Between these lay an endless variety of which he might or might not eat, as pleased himself. Of the tree of life he must eat, and thus he was reminded, in a positive symbol, of his dependence for the sustenance of his being upon God. Of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil he was forbidden to eat, and thus he was reminded of the limitation of his freedom within the government of God. Finite will is to be tested, and it will stand or fall as it submits to, or rebels against the Infinite Will of the Infinite God. Thus unfallen man was a being created in the image of God, living in union with God, cooperating in activity with God, having the points of the limitation of his being marked by simple and definite commands laid upon him, gracious prom­ises luring him to that which was highest on the one hand, and a solemn sentence warning him from that which was lowest on the other. He was a sovereign under a Sovereignty, independent, but dependent. He had the right of will, but this could only be perfectly exercised in perpetual submis­sion to the higher will of his God. The whole fact is summarized concerning essential human nature in the exquisite couplet,
Our wills are ours, we know not how;
Our wills are ours to make them Thine." (Tennyson)


UNFALLEN ADAM

UNFALLEN ADAM

"And God said; Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. And God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them." (Gen 1:26-27)


  The essential truth concerning the nature of man is contained in a descriptive expression found in the book of Genesis, and in New Testament Scriptures. He is spoken of as being "created in the image and likeness of God." In order to understand the significance of this expression, it will be best to read the whole of the Scriptures where it occurs.
"And God said; Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. And God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them." (Gen 1:26-27)
"This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made He him." (Gen 5:1)
"Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made He man." (Gen. 9:6)
"For a man indeed ought not to have his head veiled, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man." (1 Cor. 11:7)
"In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the Gospel of the glory of Christ, Who is the Image of God, should not dawn upon them." (2 Cor. 4:4)
"Who is the Image of the invisible God, the First-born of all creation." (Col. 1:15)
"And have put on the new man that is being renewed unto knowledge after the image of Him that created him." (Col. 3:10)
"Who being the effulgence of His glory, and the very image of His substance, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had made purification of sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high." (Heb. 1:3)
These are the only passages in which the fact of man's being created in the image and likeness of God is definitely declared. What is intended by the expression may be illuminated by an examination of the actual words used. The root idea of the Hebrew word translated "image" is that of a shadow. Of the other word there can be no better translation than the one adopted that namely, of likeness.
Turning to the New Testament, the word translated "image" in the first four Scriptures quoted, is the word Etikwn, which suggests the idea of an outline resemblance, very literally a profile. The word translated "image " in the passage from Hebrews is the word capakthr, which simply means an exact copy, or an engraving. Thus it will be seen that both in Old and New Testaments, the expression suggests a definite resemblance, rather than an exact representation, except where, as already indicated in the letter to the Hebrews, the language is descriptive of Christ in such aspect of His Person as is peculiar to Him­self, and in which men by original creation have no participation.
Passing over these Scriptures again, let the progression of thought be noted carefully. In the account of creation, it is affirmed that man was in some respect a shadow or manifestation of God. Here are two ideas, arresting thought, and not to be forgotten in the subsequent discussion. First, man is but a faint representation, a shadow merely; and secondly, the very dignity of his being lies in the fact that he is even so much as that. Perhaps the simplest exposition of the thought would be gained by a contempla­tion of the shadow of a man cast upon some white back­ground, by the shining of a great light. What the shadow would be to the man, the man would be to God: like and unlike, suggesting an idea, but by no means explaining the mystery, impossible apart from the substance, and yet infinitely less in essence than the substance. Man no more perfectly expresses all the facts concerning God, than does the shadow those concerning man. Neverthe­less the shadow is the image of the man, and indicates truth concerning him.
This expression never occurs in the Old Testament after the account of creation, except when in Genesis 9:6, man is safeguarded from murder, the reason given being that no man has a right to destroy that which was made in the Divine image, thereby government was instituted to cover such cases. By the act of sin, the image and likeness of God in man was not destroyed but defaced, and in all the history, contained in Old Testa­ment Scripture, is seen a degraded ideal.
Turning to the New Testament, after the completion of the work of Christ, the expression is restored in the writ­ings of the apostle. In the Scripture first quoted, he is evidently referring to man as to the original Divine inten­tion concerning him, and he speaks of him as the “image and glory of God." (1 Cor. 11:7) In the second reference he uses the expression of Christ, as the One Who has realized that primal Divine intention, and in Colossians he declares that the original Divine ideal may be restored through the work of Christ. In Hebrews, where it has been shown, the word is a far stronger one; it is used of Christ, Who is infinitely more than a shadow of God, seeing that He is "the effulgence of His glory, and the very image of His substance." (Heb. 1:3)
Having thus examined the Scriptures, and the use of the phrase therein, it may be asked, in what sense was man created in the image of God? The answer to the question may be found, by suggesting another question. What is man essentially, for it is in his essential nature that he is in the image of God? Man essentially is SPIRIT, his present BODY BEING HIS PROBATIONAL DWELLING PLACE, that through which he receives impressions, and that through which he expresses the fact of his own being. In his letter to the Romans the apostle says, "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service." (Rom. 12:1) The marginal reading of the Revised Version changes the word “service" into "wor­ship," and therein lies a revelation of the true relation of the spirit of man to his body. Through the medium of the body, the truth concerning the spirit expresses itself. WHERE THE BODY IS PRESENTED, IT IS PRESENTED BY THE SPIRIT, AND THROUGH THIS DEVOTION OF THE BODY, THE SPIRIT EXPRESSES ITS “WORSHIP.” THE ESSENTIAL FACT IN MAN THEREFORE IS HIS SPIRIT, AND IT IS IN SPIRITUAL ESSENCE THAT MAN IS MADE IN THE IMAGE OF GOD. There are secondary senses in which even in bodily form, man is a shadow of Deity. As THE BODY OF MAN IS THE EXPRESSION OF HIS SPIRIT, and THE SPIRIT IS THE IMAGE OF GOD, so through the tabernacle of man's spirit there are made certain suggestions concerning God Him­self.
The present article however, is confined to the essential fact. Within the spiritual fact of man's being there are three constituents. These have been variously described. Perhaps at once the simplest and most lucid analysis is that of Kant. He speaks of INTELLIGENCE, EMOTION, and WILL. It is in the possession of these things that man is in the image of God. GOD IS A SPIRIT, HAVING INTELLIGENCE, HAVING EMOTION, HAVING WILL. Man is in the shadow of God. He also is a spirit, having intelligence, having emotion, having will. In all these things he is but a shadow, that is to say, there are limitations upon these facts in human nature, which in the Divine are illimitable and consequently cannot to be perfectly understood of men, it has been objected to the doctrine of the personality of God that the thought of personality implies limitation. This, however, is to argue from a false hypothesis. Per­fect personality is unlimited, so that personality is only perfect in God, and is imperfect in man. In God intel­ligence is unlimited, emotion is unlimited, will is unlimited. In man all these facts are found, but in each case within limitations. He does not know all things, his intelligence being limited, his emotional nature also can only act within comparatively narrow limitations, and the exercise of his will is limited by the demand for a cause, which is never perfectly found within himself.
Man as originally created, was not only in the image of God. He was also made to live in union with God, so that all his limitation might find its complement in the un­limited life of the Eternal. It is a great mistake to think of man as made, and then put into some position, where he might rise or fall, according to the capacity of his own personality. It is rather to be remembered that he was created in the image of God, and then put in the probationary position through which he was to pass unharmed to some larger form of existence, if his life were lived in union with the God Who had created him. If however he chose a separate existence, and cut himself off from union, in that act, he would encompass his own ruin, he would fall. And Satan understood that himself a fallen creature.
This intended life of union with God may be described in two ways, as personal fellowship, which is holiness of character; and as cooperative activity, which is righteous­ness of conduct. For a full understanding of what this meant, it is useless to linger in the Garden of Eden. There, in the account of creation, a faint suggestion is given of the Divine intention is necessary, however, to come to the last Adam, the Man Jesus, for a full appreciation of this Divine intention. In Him unbroken and constant fellowship with the Father manifested itself in holiness of character, and unceasing cooperation with God expressed itself in absolute righteousness of conduct.
In order to an appreciation of the meaning of fellowship with God there must be remembered the analysis of per­sonality already referred to, intelligence, emotion, and will. In unfallen man the limited intelligence was nevertheless enlightened, and was able to understand the things of God through God sharing with him in the cool of the day. (Gen. 3:8) Limited emotion was nevertheless enkindled towards the things thus known, and man loved God and all He loved. The limited will was yet energized by the superior and Infinite Will of God, and so chose always the things that were in harmony with that Will. Thus in unfallen man there was to be found enlightened intelligence, enkindled emotion, energized will, wholly within the realm of the Divine Sovereignty.
Then beyond that personal fellowship, there was coopera­tive activity, which is righteousness of conduct, naming the animals, dressing and keeping the garden. And again the analysis of personality may be taken as the basis of consideration. All activity is the outward expression of an inward intelligence. The enlightened intelligence of unfallen man, appreciating the things of God, the deeds of the life of such a being were in perfect harmony with the purposes of God. The emotional nature of such a being, appreciating and loving the things of God, became the spring from which streams of action emerged, which were all moving in the Divine direction. In such a being the will exercised its highest function in choosing the things of God, and the activities of the life were therefore always those of partnership with the enterprises of God. The old word spoken to the father of the race was "have dominion." (Gen. 1:28) In the midst of a wondrous creation God set man. The creation in which man found himself had not yet realized all the possibilities of its own being. It waited the touch of man in cooperation with God for that realiza­tion. God put man into a garden to dress it, and to keep it. The preparation of man's work was of God, the crea­tion of the worker was of God, there was perfect fitness between the work to be done, and the workman prepared, and while man lived in fellowship with God, and co­operated with God, all creation recognized his leadership, yielded to his dominion, and moved along the line of a new progress towards a yet more wondrous beauty and per­fection.


Wednesday, December 13, 2017

QUESTIONING LAW AND ORDER

QUESTIONING LAW AND ORDER

“Has God said….?”  Gen. 3:1


In considering the Bible account of the fall of man, it is necessary first to note carefully the process of mans temptation. In the story of Genesis is clearly revealed the great distinction between testing and tempting. Man's position in the economy of God was one in which he was in the place of testing. That testing became definite enticement towards evil through the agency of evil already existing, and expressing itself through its prince, the devil. The method of the enemy was full of all tact. He first asked a question which was calculated to create the sense of restricted liberty, and so cast an aspersion on the goodness of God. To paraphrase the question, he said, in this garden is there some tree forbidden to you? Are you at any point of your will limited and restricted? The answer of the woman admitted the limitation, a limitation which certainly existed. Then the very essence of evil is seen in the interpretation of that limitation. Whereas the limitation in the purpose of God was wholly beneficent, and intended to hold man within the only sphere in which he could make progress towards the largest and fullest pos­sibility of his being; the enemy suggested that it was im­posed by a desire on the part of God to keep man from progress and enlargement of capacity. Thus it is seen that at the back of the method of the devil is an aspersion cast upon the character of God. Man was made to QUESTION THE GOODNESS OF LAW. Appealing to the INTELLIGENCE of man, the enemy created an aspersion, which was calculated to change the attitude of his EMOTION, and so capture the final stronghold, that namely of his WILL. He declared that man's intellectual nature was prevented from development by this limitation. By this declaration he created in the mind of man a question as to the goodness of the God Who had made the law, and thus imperiled the relation of the will to God, as he called it into a place of activity outside, and contrary to, the will of God.


Tuesday, December 12, 2017

TRUE GIVING

TRUE GIVING

"Beseeching us with much entreaty in regard of this grace and the fellowship." (2 Cor. 8:4)


Many years ago, in a Missions Conference, a very wise man, who was then Secretary for Christian Endeavour for the world, was conducting a question box. He took out of the box the question, "How shall we raise money for Foreign Missions?" His answer was as quick as the crack of a pistol, and as forceful: “Don't raise it, give it." In that answer is the solution of the whole problem which confronts giving at the present hour. If funds are lacking to carry on the work of God in the far distant places of the earth, it is because THE CHURCH HAS BECOME SO BUSY RAISING MONEY THAT SHE HAS CEASED TO GIVE IT.

Every method for raising funds for Missions that is spectacular, worldly, and commercial, I hold to be out of harmony with the will of God, and in the long issues calculated to hinder and not to help. If we can but return to the simple and profound principles of the New Testament in the matter of giving, we shall never have to call a halt, or beckon the workers back, in order that we may close fields into which they have entered because the Church at home is not conscious of an opportunity, or IS NOT READY TO SACRIFICE in order to enter a field.

What is the basic principle of giving? It is declared in one word, which I have already quoted in this chapter. I take it out of its context. It does not belong only to this chapter, for it is stamped upon the pages of the New Testament. It is the word "fellowship." "Beseeching us with much entreaty in regard of this grace and the fellowship." (2 Cor. 8:4) If we may but come to an appreciation of the meaning of that word in all its applications, we shall have touched the profoundest basis. What is fellowship? Those of you who worship here regularly must be patient if I now repeat in this connection what I have said in other connections. The word translated "fellowship" is one of the richest words in the New Testament. So rich in suggestiveness is the Greek word "Koinonia," that not even the revisers found it possible to express it in all connections by one English word. When I take up my New Testament I find the same Greek word is translated "communion, communication, distribution, fellowship." I find, moreover, that its kindred word, "Koinonos," is translated "partaker, partner." Whereas there is something very dull in the repetition of a group of words like that, the very repetition helps us to see the richness of the word. There is one passage in the New Testament which admits us to the heart of its meaning. It occurs in connection with that fascinating picture of the early church, when it is declared that the disciples had "all things in common." (Acts 2:44; Acts 4:32) The Greek word so translated is the root from which our word fellowship comes. Fellowship with God, therefore, means that GOD HAS PLACED ALL HIS RESOURCES AT OUR DISPOSAL, and that we, dare I say, have placed ALL OUR RESOURCES AT HIS DISPOSAL? I dare not; I dare say only that we ought to place all our resources at His disposal. That is exactly what the apostle meant when he wrote to the Corinthian Christians, "We make known to you the grace of God... ye abound in everything... see that ye abound in this grace also." (2 Cor. 8:7) THE GRACE OF GOD TO YOU IS THAT HE HAS PUT ALL HIS RESOURCES AT YOUR DISPOSAL. YOUR GRACE IS TO BE MANIFESTED IN THAT YOU PUT ALL YOUR RESOURCES AT HIS DISPOSAL. That is perfect fellowship. Tell me, if the whole Christian Church understood, and lived in the power of such fellowship, would there be any need to ask the patronage and help of godless men to carry on godly work? Would there be any need whatever to recall from the field loyal hearts who are suffering and serving, but who must be brought home owing to lack of funds? This is the difficulty. God has put all His resources at our disposal, but we have not put our resources at His disposal. That is the foundation principle that ought to underlie all Christian giving.


Sunday, December 10, 2017

WHAT ABOUT THE FLESH

WHAT ABOUT THE FLESH?

"….the likeness of sinful flesh." (Rom. 8:3


He took flesh, and sanctified it by taking it. He was made in the likeness of sinful flesh. The apostle is very careful to show that His flesh was not sinful, but in "the likeness of sinful flesh." (Rom. 8:3) The purely flesh life of Jesus was as holy as His spiritual life. The flesh was subservient to the spirit, the body was the instrument of the Spirit. The eye was the window of the spirit, and was never allowed to gaze on that which might harm it. His body was the temple of His spirit. His spirit reigned over His body, and so the very flesh-life of Jesus was pure and spotless and beautiful. And mark this well, He did not bruise His flesh. He never scourged Himself. He left His brutal enemies to that work. He did not produce holiness of spirit by bruising and battering the flesh. That idea was born in hell. His life was a perfectly natural life, so natural that His critics said He was a gluttonous man and a winebibber (Luke 7:34), the friend of publicans and sinners (Matt. 11:19). He loved flowers and children, went to the wedding feast, as well as to the house of mourning. His life was perfectly human, and because of the mastery of the spirit it was perfectly holy. Then through that mystery of death, which we must ever reverence and never can fathom, He set free His own life; and by regeneration and resurrection He gives His life to other men, so that in the POWER of it they also begin to live the life of holiness, cleansing themselves from the filthiness of flesh and spirit in the power of His indwelling life, answering to the desire of His Father and theirs (Matt. 5:48).


Saturday, December 9, 2017

CAN A JUST GOD FORGIVE SINS

CAN A JUST GOD FORGIVE SINS?

"Thy sins are forgiven thee." Matt. 9:2



How does Christ answer that question? I know that here we touch the realm of mystery because our finite mind cannot appreciate perfectly the infinite mind and the infinite power. Let me state the case thus. First He exercised the prerogative, He claimed to be able to forgive sins. He distinctly said, "Thy sins are forgiven thee." (Matt. 9:2, 5; Luke 5:20, 23; Luke 7:48; Mark 2:5)But He revealed the method also. By the mystery of His Cross He unveiled God's attitude toward sin, and God's activity in the presence of sin. In the hour of the Cross He did not try to persuade God to change His mind; but working together with God He unveiled before the astonished gaze of man that passion of God whereby He is able, Himself bearing human iniquity, to forgive it, to cancel it, to set the prisoner free. You say that is all theory? Follow me yet further. He told men they were forgiven. He has been telling men they are forgiven ever since, and men have entered into the consciousness of the forgiveness of sins. They have professed to know sin forgiven. You say that is only human profession, and I reply that men have exemplified the truth of their profession in the new lives which they have lived. I hold that the last and ultimate proof of the absolute Deity of the Man of Nazareth is the consciousness in the soul that sin is forgiven by what He is and what He did. The demonstration that sins are forgiven is to be found in the fact that a man whose sins are forgiven mourns the sins forgiven to the end of his life and fights against them, and rises on the basis of that deep and inner consciousness to life that is pure and strong and holy (Jude 24) ending in the desire of the Father (Matt. 5:48). That is the utmost miracle of Christianity. When you are next theorizing about the atonement, and the forgiveness of sins, spend an hour in the slums, in a Salvation Army barracks, and look into the faces of some of the men; find out what they say, what they are, and hear from their lips the repetition of the apostolic word, "We are His witnesses." In the Cross He drew the veil a little way aside, and I see God in Christ, suffering, and so setting me free from sin. I cannot believe in the possibility of the forgiveness of sins by a just God until I come face to face with the Christ.

Friday, December 8, 2017

DEATH TO THE UNSAVED

DEATH TO THE UNSAVED

"As he reckons within himself so is he." (Prov. 23:7)



What is the beginning of the life to come for the man who is irreligious? Death. What is death for that man? Exactly what it is for the other, transition, the laying aside of a tent, the entry upon a vaster environment. What, then, is the difference? Let me answer that question, by asking another. Is there still a point of identity? Yes, there is. As in the life of the saint the word that marks the relation of this life to the life that is to come is continuity, so also is it in the life of the godless man. The set of the life here is the set of the life hereafter. Each man makes for the depth of hell by desires and lusts created over a lifetime. The direction of the life here is the direction of the life hereafter. When a man lays aside the tent he enters upon a larger, more mysterious, wonderful existence. What is he there? What he is here. But he lacks the vehicle to perform the lusts he has accumulated, his or her body. And those lusts, cravings, desires go on for eternity. You ask me about a second probation. The word of God has nothing to say about a second probation, and I have nothing to say about it. I do know of the present probation, and I know that the probation of today is to every man in the world, and I know that the basis of the present probation is the light a man has, and not the light he lacks. As a man passes out of this life into the next the matter of utmost importance is not what he believes about Jesus, for there are thousands who have never heard His name. What is the matter of utmost importance? The set of the life, the direction of the life. The matter of utmost importance to me as I pass out of this world is not the actual influence of the moment, but the direction, the master passion of the life, the thing that drives and impels and inspires, for that is the central thing after all. "As he reckons within himself so is he." (Prov. 23:7) What is your thinking? That is the deepest of you! Is it passionate desire to do the will of God? That is the set of your life and death does not change it. Is the deepest thing in your life desire to please yourself? That is the set of your life and death does not change it. You go out into the vaster environment in which vaster environment you discover more terribly and awfully your inability to satisfy the deepest cry of your own life. Hunger without bread. Thirst without water. Desire without answer. No body to fulfill the longings.